Racism

May 30th, 2010
by Tobias

RACISM

As we approach touchy subjects such as racism, we must understand that they are touchy because it is a topic of which the subjects have no control over certain aspects, ie. Physical appearances common among certain genotypes.  When it comes right down to it, we are all of the same species, but some have spots, some have stripes.  With that said, it is impossible to get away from the fact that some people ARE physically different: skin tone, ocular shapes, shapes & sizes of noses, amount/color/shape of hair and even smell (varies even among races depending upon traditional diets & regions that have different bacterial influences on the body, and thus, the body puts off different odors. For example, certain anglo groups, when exposed to synthetic food products, smell like sour milk, which is why some poor people stink in a particular, identifiable way.).  Also just as impossible to avoid is the fact that the human brain has evolved to be fantastic at noticing differences and similarities and making categorical associations.  We have as mammals also evolved particular abilities to identify human faces, so that babies can quickly identify mothers.  These two evolutionary adaptations, when joined together in the human experience, will inevitably result in seeing different physical characteristics among each other.  This is exemplified in psychological experiments (and your own children, if you have any) where children are obviously noticing ‘racial’ differences in each other.  At this point, the child noticing these racial differences, really has no particular associations with those differences, simply that they are different from ‘me’.  It is how we are raised and the associations we are taught about those differences that we begin to see ‘racism’ surface as a concept.  Therefore, I believe that the loaded term ‘racism’ as we see it used commonly today, is not inherently discriminatory, since it was originated simply as a categorical label, but it has become so loaded by all the negativity people have come to use when describing races other than their own.  This, of course, evolved as a defensive trait during the times of hunter/gather days for tribal protectionism and survival, but has now gone the way of the appendix on the large intestine: it’s still there, but it doesn’t do anything good anymore, and it can definitely kill you if it explodes.

So racism is something that is in our nature, but it is the continued associations we make with it that need to be changed, since differences need not be viewed as negatives, but rather at least neutral if not positives.  For anecdotal example, I have never seen an ugly mixed-race kid, and they are often healthier than their parents.  This is another one of the tricky evolutionary things, where creating diversity within the gene pool is preferred, so one must go outside your ‘race’ to get new genes in the mix.  This can account for men being attracted to whatever woman they can’t have, whether that is a married man looking for strange, or a man attracted across races when it is culturally taboo for him.  This instinct to increase the gene pool by spreading your seeds is not only a masculine thing, since women are hormonally programmed to no longer be attracted to the father of their children (this is true, look it up.). 

Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments (0)

Chicken or Egg?

May 30th, 2010
by Tobias

CHICKEN OR EGG?

Experimental psychologist Steven Pinker has a book called ‘the language instinct’ which is solely concerned with the ‘Chicken & Egg’ scenario surrounding thoughts/concepts and words.  Quite simply, do we have a concept first, then find a label for it, or do we have words to describe things and if there’s no word, there’s no concept of it?  His argument is laid out much better, but the idea is not as easy to answer as one would think.

The obvious answer is that of course the thought comes first, but let’s look at it closer.  If I have a thought, and it is related to something like time, for instance, I could try to describe that thought to you (or even myself, for that matter) but if there is/are no word/words related to the particular concept I have had a thought about, that thought could not be communicated and thus, fails as a concept.  It’s somewhat like the existence of sub-atomic particles that are there when we expect to see them, but they ‘disappear’ just as quickly as we can see them; they exist, then they don’t.  Let’s try this one out with an example of time.

Read the rest of this entry »

Tags: ,
Posted in Philosophy | Comments (1)

What’s on the Alter?

May 30th, 2010
by Tobias

Alter

Isn’t ironic that the term “Alter” is used to indicate a place of worship & sacrifice/offerings to a particular Deity with the intent to change some situation.
That is the definition of Alter when used in secular speech, to change something.
As in taking drugs can Alter your state of mind and perceptions; you see the world differently. Thus, religious ceremonies have traditionally included substances to Alter the perception of the devotee, this process often performed at a particular location and/or using artifacts of significance in a particular arrangement. Bar none, the most commonly used substance is cannabis. Some call it the Tree of Life, because of its medicinal properties as well as its psychoactive effects. Cannabis has been used in all cultures where it has been found, and has been important enough to transplant along trade routes as well, so that it covers the globe bordering the polar regions. In fact, cannabis is to closely tied to humans through our history that we actually have *THC receptors in the brain. This says that is has either been with us at a critical bottleneck in our evolutionary history, or it has been ubiquitous throughout our existence.
This substance, cannabis, has now in our societies been replaced by currency. We now use the other green to stimulate our production of Seratonin & Dopamin (feelings of joy/pleasure & well being/security/comfort) by spending money, winning money, hoarding money, displaying our overabundance of money (real or by credit), and it has even overtaken the western religions as well. Since cash is now king, religion must control it, too. Religion has always been the king maker, or at least right along side the king in the manipulation and control of the masses: king controls the body, clergy controls the mind.
This new King, however, has taken serious hold on the mind as well, and religion has lost its grip on the control over the mental aspect of the masses. This is a dilemma for religion, since tithing & buying indulgences, etc. has always been a way to enrich themselves & keep the masses poor (tithing, taxes & you’re broke) but now the tool (cash/currency) has become the new opiate at the Alter. This one, however, has different effects on the brain, since it is also the single means of getting what you need in life. By this, it has a sense of scarcity about it, so it instills the need to hoard and control it. This equals emotions of greed, whereas the previous tool of worship was intended to give one a sense of ease and peace and communion with Deity.
The proof of currency being the new means of worship are all around us: stock markets, compound interest, home loans, credit, Churches are obsessed with it, it has invaded sex/love/marriage, and if you don’t have any of it you feel as if life isn’t worth living. Further example is in our speech. Some women feel they need ‘retail therapy’ in order to forget their woes or feel better about themselves. Everyone is capable of murder, and everyone has their price, thus the phrase often used to define a particular business deal or person’s salary that is a very large sum of money would be ‘he’s making a killing’. The term formerly used for something that doesn’t function properly has now been co-opted to mean not having any money: broke. So if you don’t have any money you can’t function properly? When describing someone who looks very beautiful or handsome one says “you look like a million bucks.” Even when someone dies, it referred to as “bought the farm.” And we have gone so far as to define love against money by saying “I wouldn’t trade your love for all the money in the world.” (although most people really would). When we are sick we no longer use diet to heal ourselves, we pay someone to fix our health for us, but it has turned into fixing symptoms, rather than effecting cures. If you were to try to live without currency, you would quickly become an outlaw in some way or another. And finally, not everyone believes in god, but everybody believes in money!
So we need to remove money, the artificial creation of man, from the Alter, and replace it with something that was originally intended to actually Alter things for us. Reclaim the function of worship, health & Altering our reality to actual substances, such as cannabis, peyote, mescaline, mushrooms, coca, datura root, etc. Money is for commerce, nothing more.

*(Seratonin & Dopamine receptors in the brain are, at the molecular level, are able to accept the hormones produced by the body or THC. So either we have evolved our hormonal systems to mirror the molecular structure and effects of THC in the brain, or cannabis is Manna! Either way, it is Good for us.)

Tags: , , , ,
Posted in Philosophy, Religion | Comments (1)

Supreme Court Justice

May 11th, 2010
by Mouse

Obama has selected Elena Kagan as the next Supreme Court Justice and of course the Republicans take issue with it. I’m not sure that there would be anyone that they wouldn’t take issue with, even if it were one of them being nominated.

I, personally, don’t like Obama or most of what he has done in office. I didn’t like Bush either, so there.

Read the rest of this entry »

Tags: , , ,
Posted in Politics | Comments (0)

Free Will

May 8th, 2010
by Mouse

This might be the first article you see about ‘Free Will’, but I will assure you that it will not be the last. Free will is every where, and we all should take the time to really look at ourselves and determine if we are, in fact, enslaving others.

I would like to start with saying that the only thing that constrains – or binds, if you will – someone is the physical body that a person is in. It is impossible for someone to bind your mind unless you allow them to do so – with the exception to torture and/or drugs.

Read the rest of this entry »

Tags: , , , ,
Posted in Philosophy | Comments (1)

Religion

May 1st, 2010
by Tobias

RELIGION

“God, protect me from your followers” & “thank God there’s no Religion in Heaven” are two of Gandhi’s more appropriate quotes for this topic.  And while we’re on Gandhi, the man who shot and killed Gandhi was a Religious extremist from his own sect.  In the name of Religion, we keep dying people on machines & in pain, attend & fund organizations that harbor pedophiles, we decimate entire cultures & have lost cures for many diseases hundreds of years ago because of the total annihilation of native cultures in South America by Anglo-Christian colonizers, we continue to fight and hate each other because our chosen Idols have different names.

Can we seriously be that enamored with belief systems that start off with” god said, you can have anything you want, but that which is already yours (knowledge).  if you partake of that one fruit (knowledge), you will be Damned forever, as will all your descendants.”  Really?  the first story is “knowledge is evil”?   So we bought into a belief system that told us to deny our nature (knowledge: that which allows for our greatest creations (including God & Religion), communication systems, art, science, medicine, culture, etc.) and listen only to this particular set of people on how life should be lived…. in fact, we don’t even want you to be able to read this book for yourself….

Read the rest of this entry »

Tags: , , ,
Posted in Religion | Comments (1)

God

April 30th, 2010
by Tobias

God. 

In the sense that most people use that word, I do not ‘believe’ in it, in the strictest sense.  I have formed a view of what I call “God”, and that is based out of Buddhist writings, Quantum Mechanics, personal experiences and the normal human inclination to have answers.  God is no particular entity or being somewhere aloft watching over us; there is no He or She, there is no jealousy in worship, or sense of good and evil or right and wrong.  all of those are human concepts, based in an existence of percieved duality: me/not me, up/down, left/right, here/there etc. (for a great explanation of this concept and many others I reference, Read Ken Wilbur’s ‘A Brief History of Everything, and many of his earlier books).  So when I say I don’t believe in God, that is not to say that I don’t believe in anything, because I most certainly do believe in something.  and it is somehting I believe is actually quite reassuring and beautiful.  What I would call God is this: The ‘Stuff’ that underlies everything we percieve to be matter.  speaking in Buddhist terms, The Void, or The Nothingness (No-Thing-Ness) or The Oneness.  In Quantum Mechanical terms, it is the 99.99999% empty space between sub-atomic particles (that, by the way, seem to exist when we expect to see them, but aren’t there all the time, and manifest/disappear spontaneously).  This may be Dark Matter, but that is not yet proven.  In short, to me, what I call God is everywhere, underlies everything, and still does not exist (that we can prove… yet).  This No-Thing-God of mine is the connection we feel between people when we say “we’ve met somewhere before” when we haven’t, that’s the mechanism/possible explaination for ESP, Clairvoiance, Ghosts, Hauntings, Spirit/Soul (but not Poltergeists, that PK activity, but we’ll talk about that later) Carl Jung’s ‘The Collective Unconscious, ‘Magic’, Aliens (just older, more advanced beings, right? not so scary… only scary because, again, we attribute our feable wants/desires/inclinations/behaviors onto more advanced & misunderstood beings) True Love (again, much of ‘love’ is a biological maternal/paternal instinct; we’ll get to this later, too) and, of course, explains the existence of matter itself.  This concept is alluded to in most traditional teachings that Religions are based upon (yet down-played in the perpetuation of Religious Dogma & control), and in many poetic & essoteric writings.  So by this theory, what would be God, doesn’t give a shit if you’re a ‘good’ or ‘bad’ person; you’re just ‘person-experession’.  There is no ‘good’ or ‘bad’, there just Is.  There is no ‘Right’ or ‘Wrong’; these are concepts based upon our perspective on existence.  To Nature (a beautiful expression of ‘God’), the eruption of a volcano, extinction of a species (including us), or complete passing of a solar system through its life cycle has no ‘Value’ associated with it.  It just Is. 

To me, to attempt to simplify that concept of “everything that is, is God” down to some jealous, vengeful & quite flawed Super-Man/flying-space monster that cares WHICH fictional diety we worship is quite insulting and simple minded.  And even more insulting is to enslave, kill or otherwise manipulate other beings in the name of some fictional view of what you believe your Oogie-Boogie wants you to do…

Read the rest of this entry »

Tags: ,
Posted in Religion | Comments (1)